Interpreting Meaning in Words: Exploring Thematic Analysis as a Qualitative Data Analysis Method
Keywords:
Qualitative Data Analysis, Thematic Analysis, Interview Data, Methodological Rigor, interpreting patternAbstract
Data analysis in qualitative research is to arrange the qualitative data, interpret the data, and communicate findings. It needs an in-depth understanding of the context, knowledge in the field, expertise, skills, and a considerable amount of time to interpret qualitative data and get sense out of the data. There are a number of procedures to analyze qualitative data, i.e., thematic analysis, content analysis, narrative analysis, discourse analysis, framework analysis, and ground theory analysis. The current study employed a systematic literature review to explore the procedures and principals involved in thematic analysis. Thematic analysis generally involves identifying, analyzing, and interpreting patterns of meaning (themes) within qualitative data. Data was obtained from authentic peer-reviewed journals, and the inclusion criteria were based on thematic analysis, peer-reviewed publications, and updated publications. The paper elaborates on seven-step thematic analysis procedures and concludes the process of thematic analysis in seven steps, i.e., transcribing the data, organizing the data, finding concepts in the data, making themes in the data, keeping reliability and validity in the process, explaining the findings, and concluding the findings. The paper argues that while thematic analysis is flexible, rigorous application is essential for methodological credibility.
Download the article from here:
https://ijss-sjau.com/index.php/IJSS-SJAU/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/11
Downloads
References
Alhojailan, M. I. (2012). Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West east journal of social sciences, 1(1), 39-47.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, 77-101
Boyatzis, R.E. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications.
Creswell. J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design — choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks California.
Denzin K.N. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Goodwin et al. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA papers in pragmatics, 1(1), 1-54.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage.Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks California, 1996.
Marshall, C. and G. Rossman (1995). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks California.
Marks, D. and Yardley, L. 2004. Research methods for clinical and health psychology. SAGE.
Miles, H.B., and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks California.
Namey, E., Guest, G., Thairu, L. and Johnson, L. (2008). Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. Handbook for team-based qualitative research. Rowman Altamira
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Rubin, J.H. and Rubin, S.J. (1995). Qualitative interviewing, the art of hearing data. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks California.
Schopper et al. (1993). Results from the L3 experiment at LEP. Phys. Rep., 236 (CERN-L3-055), 1-146.
